I find that there are at least six types of questions that the community on Christianity.StackExchange finds acceptable for the site. These question types, if the few rules that accompany them are followed, almost always remain open and receive high quality answers.

Christianity.StackExchange Proven Question Types:

  1. Questions usually need to ask for a perspective. Who do they want an answer from? Example. You see in this question and my answer to it, there is a very strict Roman Catholic frame. The question is about a Catholic dogma and my answer uses the official Catechism of the Catholic Church to answer it.

  2. Some questions are about a perspective (or opinion or denomination) in general. Example. In this question, the author knows that 7th Day Adventism is different, but wants to know how. My answer clearly and factually addresses that; I tell him what SDA's believe that is different from "mainstream" Christianity.

  3. Some questions are about factual history. Example. This question wants a straight forward, historical account of when and how a certain theology developed.

  4. Some questions are opinion history. Example. This question is technically asking for something that we cannot factually answer, but we can factually support it. My answer uses quotes from Augustine's own writings to support my conclusion. This one is similar, but is different in that you would need to use factual points about historical circumstances to support any conclusion. Naturally, there may be disagreements that ensue in the comments. The opposing party is always welcome and even encouraged to provide his opposing view in his own answer.

  5. Some questions ask for the "biblical Basis." Example. It is vital to note that a good answer to this kind of question mandates that you provide the verses and arguments used by proponents of the view in question. Whether the verses are being interpreted correctly of not by proponents of that view is irrelevant to this site. Another example here.

  6. Similar to "biblical basis" is asking why a certain Bible story happened the way it did. Example. This is like the opinion history in point 4 above, but is relative to the Bible only. It is difficult to support these questions with outside sources, but usually are answered well by spelling out exactly what happened and how the culture and times might have affected it. Here is another example. And another. And another close one. It is a popular format and is usually asked by those curious for more details about last night's Bible study.

  7. After all these are the others. These are on a case by case basis and you need to be careful how you word things or it will be closed. It seems that eschatology is almost always off-topic. Example. Another Example. Christian culture is almost always off-topic as well (though I quarrel with that). Example. Another Example. Other off-topics are "What should I do?" or "What is the Christian thing to do?" Those are pastorial advice questions and are easy to spot. If it is not directly about Christianity then it is off-topic. Example. Also, questions without a frame asking for what is true ("Truth questions") are off-topic. Example. An ironically broad off-topic question type is one that is too broad. The scope is simply too narrow to answer succinctly and effectively on this site. If you asked a question that was closed as too broad, but don't necessarily know why, it is simple because the topic is way more complicated then you originally thought.

If you can follow the format of the question types 1 through 6 then the community finds it acceptable (usually) and it will remain open. For answering these questions at least follow this one rule always: If you can quote the Bible or something else to support your answer then do it. Question types that fall under "other" (type 7) are risky. I would suggest that you do not try to ask or answer any questions in that type until you are more familiar with the site and how the community reacts to certain subjects.

Also, remember that everything about Christianity is somebody's opinion. Here on this site we try our best to stick to describing those various opinions. We try not to take sides and appear like the site supports one opinion over another. That is the single unifying point for all of the above, on-topic question types. Always ask and answer as objectively as possible.

I welcome notes on other question types that I didn't mention. –  fredsbend Jan 22 at 21:25
nice work and research –  The Freemason Jan 23 at 18:27
@fredsbend I had thought people might come to the site for good answers to questions that trouble them. Your guidelines promote describing only 'historical' viewpoints. This poses a problem if there are new answers to questions. Now, generally I agree that their are few new answers; however, it would be silly to think there are no new answers (like thinking - in technology - that everything than can be invented has been). It would be ironic if your guidelines actually prevented people giving the best answers to questions, because the answer is not 'historical'. –  InsideOut Jun 29 at 9:55
@InsideOut Well, history is one part. In a phrase, the site focuses on existent doctrine. The primary question type is "What does [denomination/theological framework] teach about x?" If you can prove that any particular church teaches it than it is on topic. On-topic questions always remain open to new answers. If there is new information on a topic then a new answer is in order. For "Questions that trouble them," we have a strict no pastoral advice policy, if that's what you were talking about. –  fredsbend Jun 29 at 15:55
This is a good post, but all of the links to deleted questions in paragraph #7 won't be of any use to your target audience: new visitors. –  Flimzy Jul 17 at 22:15
@Flimzy I was afraid this would eventually happen. Maybe the mods can get me a permalink or something. I'll flag them down in chat. –  fredsbend Jul 17 at 22:18

1 Answer 1

Edit: This post has been removed and reposted as a question here: Proposal for new category of acceptable questions

Commenters/Voters are invited to cut and paste across comments and re-vote as applicable before this modified post is deleted.

Perhaps this is posted in the wrong place. I think a new post would be a better place for this. I don't see it as directly related to the original post above it. –  fredsbend Sep 21 at 21:21
The Christian view of Mohammad question made the hot questions list, so it received a disproportionate amount of views from all over the SE network. I wouldn't read too much into my answer's high upvote count. –  fredsbend Sep 21 at 21:24
Different search terms: how should a christian respond to christian haters –  fredsbend Sep 21 at 23:03
I think we just have to edit these (if possible) into overview questions. There shouldn't be a separate type of question. –  curiousdannii Sep 22 at 2:02
@curiousdannii Perhaps you have something there, but there does seem to be a fundamental difference. That difference is that the overview usually starts with the assumption that the various denominations have differing views. This "elementary inquiry" has no assumptions because they cannot be not known to the OP due to ignorance. I think I'm going to flag this to be converted into a new post, then, bruised reed, you can edit and link to this post if you think that it is relevant and necessary. –  fredsbend Sep 22 at 2:14
@fredsbend OK mate, whatever way you think is best. –  bruised reed Sep 22 at 3:20

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .