http://hermeneutics.stackexchange.com

I thought the community here would be interested.

It will be interesting to see how that proposal and this one co-exist.

Here are some relevant questions on their meta:

share
    
You couldn't have posted this at a better time. :P –  El'endia Starman Oct 11 '11 at 20:01
    
@El'endiaStarman: what do you mean? –  Wikis Oct 11 '11 at 20:07
    
Wait a few moments and you'll see. –  El'endia Starman Oct 11 '11 at 20:07
    
@El'endiaStarman: are you talking about the cleanup? –  Wikis Oct 11 '11 at 20:14
    
I am indeed. This question makes it clear(er) that BH.SE is for exegesis and †.SE should now be for doctrine. We have more posts to come, but we're waiting on feedback to the first one. –  El'endia Starman Oct 11 '11 at 20:22
2  
@El'endiaStarman: I don't think that's a good way of explaining it. Exegesis is still on topic here! But only exegesis that is used to define or defend a point of doctrine. Likewise hermeneutics will be doing exegesis but stop short of dealing with the many varied points of application of the doctrines that come out of that. –  Caleb Oct 11 '11 at 20:34
    
@Caleb: Yeah, I gave the extremely simplified version. –  El'endia Starman Oct 11 '11 at 20:36
5  
My opinion: we shouldn't have this split. But we'll see how it plays out... –  Wikis Oct 11 '11 at 20:43
    
You're missing a t. –  TRiG Oct 12 '11 at 10:21
    
@TRiG - who? You think I should be twikis?! :) –  Wikis Oct 12 '11 at 10:52
    
@Wikis: though -> thought. I'm a proofreader. I can't help myself. –  TRiG Oct 12 '11 at 10:55
    
@TRiG: nice catch, thank you. –  Wikis Oct 12 '11 at 11:06

1 Answer 1

up vote 0 down vote accepted

Some of the best questions here on C.SE are pure biblical hermeneutics questions. Does this mean they should now be migrated over there? Personally I would hate to see that happen: the Bible is one of the key foundations of Christianity and for questions about it, even if they don't relate to doctrine/practice, to suddenly be off-topic here would be ludicrous.

share
    
FWIW, I agree. We'll have to see how it goes. The danger of having two sites is that one (or both) might not remain viable on its own. –  Wikis Oct 12 '11 at 9:32

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .